On the onset, we condemn the act of Debasish
Acharya slapping Abhishek Banerjee.
Action has been the essence of politics in West
Bengal since late 60’s, be it United Front or Indian National Congress or Left
Front or Trinamool Congress, none can deny that fact. There have been many more
violent incidents in Bengal politics earlier but this was first of its kind.
Debasish Acharya,a twenty-five year old engineering student slapped Mamata
Banerjee’s nephew Abhishek Banerjee during a rally at Chandipur, East
Midnapore. The incident was immediately aired by
electronic media, many were surprised, what happened next, shocked everyone, 25
to 30 men beat up Acharya with stick and bamboo. Beaten mercilessly, Achayra
succumbed with severe head injury. Mr Amiya Kanti Bhattacharjee, TMC MLA of
Chandipur tried to save Acharya, in turn he was attacked by his own party
members and badly beaten. The Journalists who were covering the bashing of
Acharya were also beaten, 4 got injured and one of them was hospitalised.
Police tried to take control of the situation which resulted in brick batting
by Trinamool supporters, 10 policemen were injured including Raj Mukherjee,
SDPO Contai; Sudharanjan Sarkar, IC Nandakumar; Kalyan Ghosh, OC Chandipur. The
mob attacked the Chandipur police station; policemen locked the Police Station
and took shelter in neighbouring houses! Acharya was admitted to Tamluk
District Hopital and later shifted to a Government Hospital at Kolkata.
Police charged Acharya under section 307, 506, 447,
323 and 120B of IPC. Let us understand these sections in brief.
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code. Attempt to murder.—Whoever does any act with such intention or knowledge,
and under such circumstances that, if he by that act caused death, he would be
guilty of murder, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for
a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and if
hurt is caused to any person by such act, the offender shall be liable either
to 1[imprisonment for life], or to such punishment as is hereinbefore
mentioned. Attempts by life convicts.—2[When any person offending under this
section is under sentence of 1[imprisonment for life], he may, if hurt is
caused, be punished with death.]
Illustrations
(a) A shoots at Z with intention to kill him,
under such circumstances that, if death ensued. A would be guilty of murder. A
is liable to punishment under this section.
(b) A, with the intention of causing the death
of a child of tender years, exposes it in a desert place. A has committed the
offence defined by this section, though the death of the child does not ensue.
(c) A, intending to murder Z, buys a gun and
loads it. A has not yet committed the offence. A fires the gun at Z. He has
committed the offence defined in this section, and if by such firing he wounds
Z, he is liable to the punishment provided by the latter part of 3[the first
paragraph of] this section.
(d) A, intending to murder Z by poison, purchases
poison and mixes the same with food which remains in A’s keeping; A has not yet
committed the offence defined in this section. A place the food on Z’s table or
delivers it to Z’s servant to place it on Z’s table. A has committed the
offence defined in this section.
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code. Punishment for criminal intimidation.—Whoever commits, the offence of
criminal intimidation shall be punished with imprisonment of either
description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with
both; If threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, etc.—And if the threat be
to cause death or grievous hurt, or to cause the destruction of any property by
fire, or to cause an offence punishable with death or 1[imprisonment for life],
or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, or to impute,
unchastity to a woman, shall be punished with imprisonment of either
description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with
both.
Section 447 in The Indian Penal Code. Punishment for criminal trespass.—whoever commits criminal trespass shall
be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may
extend to three months, with fine or which may extend to five hundred rupees,
or with both.
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code. Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt.—Whoever, except in the case
provided for by section 334, voluntarily causes hurt, shall be punished with imprisonment
of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine
which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code. Punishment of criminal conspiracy –
(1) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy to
commit an offence punishable with death, 2[imprisonment for life] or rigorous
imprisonment for a term of two years or upwards, shall, where no express
provision is made in this Code for the punishment of such a conspiracy, be
punished in the same manner as if he had abetted such offence.
(2) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy
other than a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable as aforesaid
shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term not
exceeding six months, or with fine or with both.]
But those 25 – 30 men, who beat up the youth
haven’t been identified or arrested yet, and their charge will be culpable
homicide under section 308 of IPC!! What about beating own MLA? Is it same-sidegoal?
No Charge? What about injuring SDPO, IC and OC? Is it not physically preventing
a police officer from doing his duty?
Section 308 in The Indian Penal Code. Attempt to commit culpable homicide.—Whoever does any act with such
intention or knowledge and under such circumstances that, if he by that act
caused death, he would be guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder,
shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may
extend to three years, or with fine, or with both; and, if hurt is caused to
any person by such act, shall be punished with imprisonment of either
description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with
both. Illustration A, on grave and sudden provocation, fires a pistol at Z, under
such circumstances that if he thereby caused death he would be guilty of
culpable homicide not amounting to murder. A has committed the offence defined
in this section.
Earlier in Trinamool Congress Raj in West Bengal,
Prof. Ambikesh Mahapatra was charged under section 66A of the Information and
Technology Act, 2000 and sections 500, 509 and 114 of IPC, for forwarding
Mamata Banerjee’s cartoon by email! In another incident, a farmer asked CM
Mamata Banerjee, “What are you doing for farmers? Farmers are dying because
they have no money. Empty promises are not enough.” The farmer, Shiladitya
Chowdhury was charged with ‘criminal intimidation and physical preventing a
police officer from doing his duty’! This charge against Debasish Acharya is a
sequel to earlier events of Prof Mahapatra and farmer Shiladitya.
Who will bell the cat? Who will ask Mamata Banerjee
what was the charge against her when she jumped and danced on bonnet of Jai
Parakash Narayan’s car? What was the charge against her when she ransacked
Bidhan Sabha?
Excellent article. Debasish's action is unpardonable. However the actions by the TMC lead police is deplorable. Only proves that Police force today in WB is just an extension of TMC party office. That's Mamata Governance.
ReplyDelete